The UNC
Policy Manual
400.3.4*
Adopted 07/19/23
Technical
Correction 08/17/2023
Policy on
Faculty Workload
I.
Purpose. Faculty are the core
means by which the University of North Carolina (UNC) System fulfills its
statutory mission to “…discover, create, transmit, and apply knowledge.”[i]
Faculty apply advanced training and education towards teaching,
research/creative activity, and service in support of the mission of their
individual constituent institution and the broader UNC System mission. The Board of Governors has an obligation to ensure that the
constituent institutions are deploying and monitoring faculty workloads in a
consistent, efficient, and effective manner across the UNC System.
A. Faculty are
critical for advancing the quality and impact of the UNC System and its
constituent institutions. Faculty hold primary responsibility for designing and
implementing curricula and academic programs; facilitating student success;
engaging in research/creative activity; providing service to their disciplines
and their communities; and enhancing the quality of life for North Carolinians.
Faculty workload policies should acknowledge each of these areas and recognize
faculty members’ contributions to each.
B. North Carolina G.S.
116-1(b) specifies that the mission of the UNC System “…is to discover, create,
transmit, and apply knowledge to address the needs of individuals and society.
This mission is accomplished through instruction, which communicates the
knowledge and values and imparts the skills necessary for individuals to lead
responsible, productive, and personally satisfying lives; through research,
scholarship, and creative activities, which advance knowledge and enhance the
educational process; and through public service, which contributes to the
solution of societal problems and enriches the quality of life in the State.” Faculty
workload policies should take into account faculty
members’ contributions towards the University’s mission.
Additionally, the Board has
previously established the expectation that teaching “…should be the first
consideration of all UNC institutions” in evaluating faculty.[ii]
As such, teaching responsibilities shall serve as the core requirement and
foundation of each constituent institution’s faculty workload policy.
C. The Board of
Governors has delegated to the boards of trustees of the constituent
institutions the authority to adopt personnel policies for personnel in all
categories of university employment, including policies governing academic
tenure and promotion.[iii]
II. Required Institutional
Faculty Workload Policies.
A.
Each UNC System institution shall develop policies and procedures
implementing the provisions of this policy. Institutional policies shall be developed
by the chancellor and provost, approved by the institutional board of trustees,
and then approved by the president. Each constituent institution shall
establish, publish, and monitor specific academic unit workload requirements
that are consistent within the institution and across system institutions. All
workload decisions should be made with educational mission, student success,
and financial implications in mind.
B.
Responsibility for the successful implementation of the
institutional faculty workload policies shall be shared among the following
stakeholders:
1.
Boards of Trustees shall be responsible for ensuring the
constituent institution is implementing a faculty workload policy that advances
the institution’s mission, fosters student success, and ensures financial
sustainability.
2.
Chancellors and Provosts shall be responsible for developing
institutional policies and ensuring that all colleges, schools, departments,
and other units develop and implement faculty workload and evaluation
procedures that comply with the institutional policy in a fair and consistent
manner, with consideration of the institution’s mission and the prudent stewardship
of fiscal resources.
3.
Deans and Department Chairs[iv]
shall be responsible for working directly with faculty to establish individual
workloads that support institutional and strategic objectives in alignment with
institutional policies, procedures, resources, and mission.
4.
Faculty share in the responsibility of ensuring their workloads
are consistent with the 1.0 FTE requirement.
C.
Institutions are
responsible for ensuring that individuals serving in a supervisory capacity
effectively carry out the duties identified in this policy. Individuals serving
in a supervisory capacity should have the training and skills necessary to fulfill
this responsibility. Institutions are responsible for having a process for
reviewing and assessing workload assignments.
III.
Required Components of Faculty Workload Policies.
Each
constituent institution shall ensure that their faculty workload policies and
procedures address the following:
A.
Workload Expectations. Each full-time faculty member shall engage
in approved work that totals to 1.0 Full-Time Equivalency (FTE). Institutional
policies shall identify the process for establishing individual faculty
workload expectations in accordance with the respective missions of each institution
and the university. Faculty members have responsibility for teaching,
research/creative activity, and service.
1.
Teaching. Consistent with G.S. 116-1(b), teaching and instruction
are the central responsibilities of the UNC System and form a critical base of
workload expectations for faculty. In addition to organized courses, the
faculty member’s instructional workload also includes other instructional
efforts such as developing materials for a new course, updating materials for
an existing course, developing courseware or other materials for
technology-based instruction, supervising undergraduate research and masters’
theses and doctoral dissertations, directing students in co-curricular
activities such as plays, preparing and equipping new laboratories, supervision
of teaching assistants, supervision of internships, academic advising,
mentoring, and other activities that support student success.
2.
Research/Creative Activity. Faculty members, particularly at
constituent institutions whose overall missions include research, engage in the
work of discovering, disseminating, and applying knowledge and professional
expertise. These activities may include (but are not limited to) working in
laboratories and studios, conducting empirical and/or theoretical research,
engaging in development or translational work, and/or producing creative works.
Toward that end, faculty write articles, monographs, and grant proposals, edit
scholarly journals, prepare juried art exhibits, direct centers
and institutions, or perform in plays, concerts, or musical recitals.
Institutional policies shall specify the means and extent by which
research/creative activity responsibility counts towards a faculty member’s
total workload. These research/creative activities have significant
implications for teaching. They enable faculty members to design course
materials that reflect the state-of-the-art and cutting-edge knowledge in their
respective fields.
3.
Service. As a public university, the UNC System provides
substantial benefits to the people and State of North Carolina. Faculty members
engage in service that advances the work of the
institution and the institution’s role in supporting North Carolina. Service work
of faculty may include activities which enhance the scholarly life of the
university or the discipline, improve the quality of life or society, or
promote the general welfare of the institution, professional and academic
societies, the community, the state, the nation, or international community.
Faculty members may also be assigned administrative responsibilities, including
but not limited to, department chair/head, program director, and center
director. Institutional policies shall specify the means and extent by which
administrative responsibilities count towards a faculty member’s total
workload.
As teaching and instruction are the primary mission of the constituent
institutions, teaching shall serve as the first component of determining
faculty workload expectations. In general, a teaching load of 24 credit hours
(or equivalent contact hours) per academic year, along with routinely expected
faculty duties such as advising, committee work, and professional development
together constitute a full workload and a 1.0 FTE appointment. Faculty members
holding additional responsibilities for research/creative activities and
service as identified in their annual work plan can have their teaching
workload adjusted on a commensurate basis.
Differential teaching loads may be authorized in recognition of
differing individual circumstances including student success considerations, course
level (bachelors, master’s, doctoral), course pedagogies, programmatic
accreditation requirements, team-taught courses, research productivity, time
bought out by external grants, significant administrative or service
assignments, significant advising responsibilities, or other activities aligned
with the institution's mission and/or critical to student success as provided
for in this policy and identified in the faculty member’s annual work plan.
B. Annual Work Plan. Each faculty member
shall work with their dean or department chair to develop a work plan for the
upcoming academic year, in alignment with the institution’s workload
expectations and the needs of the academic department, college/school, or
institution. Institutional policies shall provide for the definition of the
academic year, with both 9- and 12-month options available. The work plan shall
identify the specific outputs and efforts a faculty member is expected to complete
in the next academic year, recognizing that those items may be part of
long-term or multi-year initiatives. The specific goals of the work plan should
build towards and align with the expectations of the next
summative/comprehensive review that a faculty member undergoes (e.g.,
reappointment, promotion, tenure, post-tenure review). The work plan shall
include expectations for teaching, research/creative activity, and service via
percentage time allocations that equal the faculty member’s FTE status.
C. Annual Evaluation. Each faculty member shall engage in an annual review with their department chair/head. As part of that annual review, the department chair/head shall review the work of the faculty member relative to their approved work plan. A faculty member who does not adequately satisfy their workload expectations for the review period shall be subject to a faculty success plan. The plan must include specific steps designed to lead to improvement, a specified timeline in which improvement is expected to occur, and a clear statement of consequences should improvement not occur within the designated timeline. These plans must be approved by the second-level supervisor.
IV. Annual Reporting Requirements
A. Overview and Timing. Each constituent
institution shall compile an annual report of the previous year’s faculty activity
to be presented to and approved by the board of trustees each year. The report
shall cover an academic/fiscal year basis (July 1 – June 30) and must be
approved by the board of trustees no later than September 30 each year, with a
copy submitted to the president by October 15.
B. Requirements. The annual report shall
include quantitative information on faculty workload such as organized course
sections taught, student credit hours produced, faculty contact hours, measures
of research/creative activity, and service rendered in the previous academic
year. The annual report shall include an analysis of faculty FTE allocations by
teaching, research/creative activity, and service at the department,
school/college, and institutional level. The annual report shall also include
information regarding the process by which the institution implemented the
provisions of their policy and evaluated individual faculty workloads relative
to the standards therein.
V. Other Matters
A. Effective Date.
The requirements of this policy shall be effective with the 2024-2025 academic
year. Institutions shall have internal policies in place at the beginning of
that academic year.
B. Relation to
Federal and State Laws. The foregoing policy as adopted by the Board of
Governors is meant to supplement, and does not purport to supplant or modify,
those statutory enactments which may govern or relate to the subject matter of
this policy.
C. Regulations and
Guidelines. This policy shall be implemented and applied in accordance with
such regulations and guidelines as may be adopted by the president.
D. Periodic
Review. Each institution shall review their institutional policy at least every
five years and submit a copy of that review and any changes made to the
president.
E. Approvals. All
policies and procedures required under this policy must be submitted by the
constituent institutions to the UNC System Office and approved by the president.
*Supersedes
and replaces the prior UNC Policy 400.3.4, “Monitoring Faculty Teaching
Workloads” as this version was approved by the Board of Governors on July 20,
2023.
[i] University of North Carolina Mission Statement. https://www.northcarolina.edu/our-mission/
[ii] UNC Policy
400.3.1 https://www.northcarolina.edu/apps/policy/doc.php?type=pdf&id=181
[iii] The Code, Appendix 1,
Section I.
[iv] For the
purposes of this policy, department chair shall refer to the individual with
supervisory responsibility for an individual faculty member.