The
UNC Policy Manual
400.1
Adopted 05/06/09
North
Carolina citizens and institutions must be prepared to compete in a rapidly
changing global environment. Consistent with this mandate, the University of
North Carolina Board of Governors, the University’s General Administration, and
the constituent universities shall be guided by the needs of the people of
North Carolina in their academic degree program development, approval, and
discontinuation actions. Academic program planning and procedures must be
nimble, efficient, and responsive to those needs at all levels.
Campuses
shall continue to have a lead role in identifying academic program needs and in
formulating proposals to meet those needs. The University’s General
Administration shall also engage in the identification of academic program
needs. General Administration shall develop procedures to regularly review
workforce and societal needs and, on at least a biennial basis, identify
degrees and programs beneficial to the State. General Administration shall also
periodically draw on the expertise of the faculty to identify longer-term
emerging trends that may have implications for new degree programs. In its
analysis, General Administration shall always consider whether all regions of
the State are adequately served by the University. As referenced in this
policy, needs of the State and its citizens are inclusive of requirements
growing out of local, regional, national, and global challenges.
Once
academic program needs are identified by the campuses or by General
Administration, General Administration, in consultation with the campuses,
shall forward, after appropriate review, recommendations to the Board of
Governors regarding how best to meet those needs. All campuses shall have an
opportunity to participate in a process for recommending the best way to
address those needs. Disciplinary and cross-disciplinary processes that utilize
campus faculty and administrators shall be established to recommend whether
expansion of a current degree program, collaboration in a joint degree program,
an online degree program, or a stand-alone degree program is the best option.
Campuses are urged to give high priority to collaborative or joint program
development.
In these
processes, faculty expertise is essential for sound academic decision making at
the campus and system levels. At the campus, disciplinary, cross-disciplinary,
University, and board levels, analysis and recommendation of the need for a new
academic program, the place for its establishment, and the method of its
delivery shall be based on:
(1) number, location, and mode of delivery
of existing programs,
(2) the relation of the
program to the distinctiveness of the campus and the mission of the campus,
(3) the demand for the program in the
locality, region, or State as a whole,
(4) whether the program would create
unnecessary duplication,
(5) employment opportunities for program
graduates,
(6) faculty quality and number for
offering the program,
(7) the availability of
campus resources (library, space, labs, equipment, external funding, and the
like) to support the program,
(8) the number and
quality of lower-level and cognate programs for supporting the new program,
(9) impact of program decision on access
and affordability,
(10) the expected quality of the proposed
degree program,
(11) feasibility of a joint or collaborative
program by two or more campuses, and
(12) any other consideration relevant to the
need for the program.
General
Administration shall, in collaboration with the campuses, promote the expansion
and availability of online degrees and other programs which facilitate access
to higher education for all citizens. As the availability of online degree
offerings increases, General Administration, in collaboration with the
campuses, shall incorporate consideration of online offerings into the
assessments of proposals for new academic degree programs. Online program
development is part of the academic planning and assessment processes, and
campuses will continue to take the lead in proposing the establishment of
online degree programs.
While the
responsibility for quality, efficiency, and productivity of academic degree
programs rests at the campus level, General Administration shall be responsible
for periodic reviews to determine whether productivity and quality review
processes are followed. Campuses shall regularly review the priorities of their
offerings and are to be prepared to discontinue programs that no longer meet
any significant need. In collaboration with the campuses, General
Administration shall review and revise standards for offering degree programs
at various levels and by various methodologies. The University shall balance
responsiveness with due diligence and a state-wide perspective. In achieving
this balance, General Administration shall develop expedited program review
processes for rapid response where warranted. The campuses’ faculty and
administration and General Administration shall assure a continuing commitment
to academic excellence.
The president,
after consultation with the campuses and the Board of Governors, shall
promulgate regulations to implement this Board of Governors policy and is
authorized to provide guidance to the campuses in their academic program
development and discontinuation.