The UNC Policy Manual
300.3.3[G]
Adopted
03/15/78
On October 13, 1976, the State Personnel Commission adopted the
following policy on "Student-Employees":
The employment of students by the institutions in which they are
enrolled is designed primarily to constitute one type of student financial
aid. Such employment usually is
characterized by flexible accommodation of the student's primary involvement in
educational pursuits. Thus, in terms of
hours worked, scheduling of work, and required skill and productivity, such
student workers are materially distinguishable from regular career employees.
Any person who during any period of enrollment as a student in a
public educational institution concurrently is employed by that institution
shall be considered an employee within the meaning of and subject to the State
Personnel Act only if the student-employee is employed by the institution on a full-time
permanent basis (as defined by regulations issued by or under the authority of
the State Personnel Commission) in a permanent position established and
governed pursuant to requirements of the State Personnel Commission.
This policy was adopted after concern was expressed by the
University that "student employment" within the higher education
context is not amendable to close, detailed, and uniform regulation of the type
otherwise applicable to employment within the jurisdiction of the State Personnel
Commission. Of particular (though not exclusive) concern was the potentially
negative impact on institutional "student financial aid" programs of
the originally proposed requirement that "student workers" be
compensated for their employment in the same manner and to the same extent as
"other employees." Recognition of the special character of
"student employment" and the corresponding inducements to treat
"student-employees" differently is reflected by the policy adopted by
the State Personnel Commission.
Under the State Personnel Commission policy, a person who is
properly determined to be a "student-employee" is thereby excluded
from the coverage of the State Personnel Act.
However, a person may not be so excluded if employed (1) on a
"full-time permanent basis" (2) in a "permanent position"
within the classified State Personnel Acts service. But the policy does not otherwise provide a
clear basis for defining the class of persons (viz., "student-employee")
which is the subject of the exclusion.
Consistent with the clear spirit of the policy adopted by the
State Personnel Commission, the following conclusions are reached:
1. The fact that an individual
concurrently is both enrolled in the institution and employed by the
institution does not, standing alone, render an individual a
"student-employee" for purposes of exclusion from the State Personnel
Act.
2. Classifying a person under the State
Personnel Commission policy should rest on the following judgmental
inquiry: was it the primary purpose and
intent of the institution in establishing its relationship with the individual
to confer student status or to confer employee status?
If a person is primarily a student and employment is merely
incidental to student status, then that person is a "student-employee." Conversely, if a person is primarily an
employee and enrollment is merely incidental to employee status, then that
person is not a "student-employee."
Although administration of this primary-status test would be
simplified by the availability of an easily applied formula, the matter is not
usually amendable to such treatment.
Rather, the institution most often must determine from all pertinent
circumstances whether or not, in its judgment, the individual is a
"student-employee." Pertinent
circumstances to be considered would include, but not necessarily be limited
to, the following: (1) the relative amounts of time devoted to enrollment and
to employment; (2) whether the employment was initiated before, concurrent
with, or after assumption of student status; (3) whether or not the employment
constitutes a form of "student aid" responsive to the individual's
financial needs. The classification of
individuals relative to the State Personnel Commission policy is simply
achieved in two types of situations: the individual is not a
"student-employee" if (1 ) the individual is an employee of the
institution but is not enrolled in the institution; or (2) the individual is
enrolled in the institution and, in addition, is employed by the institution on
a full-time permanent basis in a permanent position within the classified State
Personnel Act service. However, in all
other cases in which there are concurrent enrollment and employment, the
judgmental exercise prescribed above must be undertaken.
[This is a rewrite of Administrative Memorandum #99.]