| Survey Concerning the Review of Tenured Faculty Members | ||||||||||||||
| Raw Frequencies | ||||||||||||||
| Total Respondents: | 359 | |||||||||||||
| Evaluation Measure of Tenured Faculty Members | ||||||||||||||
| Promotion | Merit Increase | Professional Development | Contribution to plans | Productivity check | Performance followup | Other | ||||||||
| Count | % of total | Count | % of total | Count | % of total | Count | % of total | Count | % of total | Count | % of total | Count | % of total | |
| Purpose of faculty evaluation? | ||||||||||||||
| 348 | 97% | 355 | 99% | 287 | 80% | 287 | 80% | 283 | 79% | 262 | 73% | 17 | 5% | |
| Frequency of evaluations occuring at regular intervals? | ||||||||||||||
| One year | 102 | 28% | 339 | 94% | 246 | 69% | 253 | 70% | 226 | 63% | 103 | 29% | 11 | 3% |
| Two years | 3 | 1% | 0% | 5 | 1% | 4 | 1% | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | 0% | ||
| Three years | 22 | 6% | 1 | 0% | 8 | 2% | 5 | 1% | 7 | 2% | 0% | 1 | 0% | |
| Four years | 0% | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 | 0% | |||||
| Five or more years | 14 | 4% | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 6 | 2% | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% |
| Variable schedule | 186 | 52% | 7 | 2% | 20 | 6% | 13 | 4% | 26 | 7% | 122 | 34% | 4 | 1% |
| Does not apply | 12 | 3% | 1 | 0% | 6 | 2% | 5 | 1% | 5 | 1% | 15 | 4% | 1 | 0% |
| Is each type of evaluation mandatory or voluntary? | ||||||||||||||
| Mandatory | 269 | 75% | 332 | 92% | 235 | 65% | 245 | 68% | 243 | 68% | 190 | 53% | 12 | 3% |
| Voluntary | 72 | 20% | 12 | 3% | 36 | 10% | 27 | 8% | 24 | 7% | 31 | 9% | 4 | 1% |
| Both | 6 | 2% | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% |
| Who takes initiative to trigger each type of evaluation? | ||||||||||||||
| Faculty Member | 182 | 51% | 32 | 9% | 46 | 13% | 29 | 8% | 32 | 9% | 23 | 6% | 5 | 1% |
| Department head | 183 | 51% | 277 | 77% | 218 | 61% | 217 | 60% | 215 | 60% | 198 | 55% | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 14% | 64 | 18% | 47 | 13% | 51 | 14% | 54 | 15% | 41 | 11% | 5 | 1% |
| All of the above | 6 | 2% | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1 | 0% | ||||
| Who conducts each type of evaluation? | ||||||||||||||
| Department head | 256 | 71% | 316 | 88% | 247 | 69% | 243 | 68% | 241 | 67% | 216 | 60% | 6 | 2% |
| Peer group | 178 | 50% | 91 | 25% | 78 | 22% | 73 | 20% | 74 | 21% | 48 | 13% | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 83 | 23% | 57 | 16% | 44 | 12% | 50 | 14% | 49 | 14% | 40 | 11% | 5 | 1% |
| All of the above | 45 | 13% | 7 | 2% | 6 | 2% | 6 | 2% | 8 | 2% | 8 | 2% | 0% | |
| How are the results communicated to the faculty member? | ||||||||||||||
| Conference w/dept. head | 262 | 73% | 268 | 75% | 246 | 69% | 240 | 67% | 228 | 64% | 207 | 58% | 5 | 1% |
| Written report | 241 | 67% | 220 | 61% | 146 | 41% | 147 | 41% | 141 | 39% | 112 | 31% | 8 | 2% |
| Conf w/peer review group | 41 | 11% | 4 | 1% | 18 | 5% | 8 | 2% | 12 | 3% | 13 | 4% | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 11% | 43 | 12% | 20 | 6% | 18 | 5% | 21 | 6% | 21 | 6% | 1 | 0% |
| All of the above | 8 | 2% | 1 | 0% | 0% | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0% | ||
| Consequences of negative post-tenure review | Consequences of positive post-tenure review | |||||||||||||
| Ineligible for merit increases | 218 | 61% | May nominate for awards | 208 | 58% | |||||||||
| Draw up development plan | 150 | 42% | May receive additional support | 175 | 49% | |||||||||
| May have another review | 98 | 27% | May use for merit increase | 228 | 64% | |||||||||
| May begin formal disciplinary process | 90 | 25% | Other | 22 | 6% | |||||||||
| Other | 22 | 6% | All of the above | 14 | 4% | |||||||||
| All of the above | 3 | 1% | ||||||||||||
| UNC-GA Planning/Per.AT022/11-21-96 | ||||||||||||||
| Note: Percentages are based on respondents for each cell divided by the total number of survey respondents. | ||||||||||||||